Police departments deploy AI bots to monitor criminal suspects and protesters online, effectively CREATING CRIME

• Police agencies near the U.S.-Mexico border are spending hundreds of thousands on AI-generated online personas to surveil activists, protesters, and suspected criminals.
• New York-based company Massive Blue markets its AI tool, Overwatch, as an “AI-powered force multiplier” that deploys “lifelike virtual agents” to engage targets.
• AI personas include fabricated activists, child trafficking decoys, and protest organizers, raising concerns about First Amendment violations.
• Despite heavy investment, no evidence exists that the tech has led to arrests, with at least one police department dropping the program.

The rise of AI-powered police surveillance

Law enforcement agencies near the southern U.S. border are bankrolling an invasive, untested AI surveillance system designed to impersonate real people online to gather intelligence on political activists, suspected criminals, and even teenagers. This Orwellian program, developed by a shadowy New York tech firm, raises alarming questions about privacy, free speech, and the unchecked expansion of police surveillance.

Documents obtained by 404 Media reveal that police departments have contracted with Massive Blue, a company marketing its AI tool, Overwatch, as a cutting-edge solution to “infiltrate and engage criminal networks.” The system deploys highly convincing digital personas—avatars with full backstories, social media histories, and even friendships—to interact with targets on platforms like Instagram, WhatsApp, and encrypted messaging services.

Among the AI profiles disclosed in internal presentations are a “radicalized AI protest persona” portraying a 36-year-old divorced activist, a 14-year-old boy decoy baiting child trafficking suspects, and a “Yemeni descent” honeypot account. Notably, college protesters and protest recruiters were listed alongside drug and human traffickers, suggesting law enforcement views dissent and criminal activity as equally worthy of covert infiltration.

A dangerous erosion of Constitutional rights

While police argue such tools help combat crime, civil liberties advocates warn this unchecked surveillance crosses a dangerous line. “The government has no business creating fake personas to spy on activists exercising their First Amendment rights,” said Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. “This is the digital equivalent of planting undercover agents in peaceful protest groups—except now, it’s done at scale, with no transparency.”

The Yuma County Sheriff’s Office in Arizona tested Overwatch under a $10,000 pilot contract but ultimately abandoned it, admitting the program “did not meet our needs.” Yet, other departments continue pouring taxpayer dollars into the initiative, despite zero public evidence it has led to arrests.

Secrecy and corporate profiteering

Massive Blue and law enforcement agencies have refused to disclose operational details, citing trade secrets and ongoing investigations. Critics argue this lack of transparency prevents accountability. “If this tool is so effective, why has it produced no results?” asked investigative journalist Jordan Pearson. “And why are police hiding how they’re deploying these deceptive bots against citizens?”

The company also promotes RADAR, an AI-driven threat detection system, and VIPS (Virtual Identity Protection Service), designed to “enhance personnel safety” for undercover operations—further blurring the line between crime prevention and mass surveillance. 404 Media is at the forefront of this investigation and has the evidence documented.

A slippery slope toward authoritarianism

History shows that unchecked surveillance powers rarely stay contained. From COINTELPRO’s infiltration of civil rights groups to modern predictive policing algorithms, tools sold as crime-fighting solutions often morph into instruments of repression. Now, AI-powered deception grants authorities unprecedented ability to manipulate and monitor the public.

As police departments weaponize artificial intelligence to track protest movements and manufacture consent under the guise of “public safety,” a critical question emerges: when do we cross the point of no return? Police departments are not catching criminal activity. They are using AI to goad individuals into engaging in criminal activity. AI is being used to create criminal activity, to breach individual rights in a way that makes dissent itself a crime.

Sources include:

YourNews.com

404Media.co

MassiveBlue.io